[official][prelims 2023] How was prelims result? In or out?
Vote people, Vote!
And share!
The Force,@The Force Saxena bol raha hai zaldi ayega
I feel they may release early to avoid any ongoing chaos. Either way, ab result aane k baad hi padhai ho payegi
The Force,@The Force Saxena bol raha hai zaldi ayega
I feel they may release early to avoid any ongoing chaos. Either way, ab result aane k baad hi padhai ho payegi
Let's hope yaar it's too much to take this time
Pam123,
https://www.barc.gov.in/technologies/mvdk/index.html
Honestly, would depend ki kaha se uthaya hai sawaal.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096006/
TomiokaGiyu,
The Force,
@jogdand Finally..! Someone with a real understanding of Gyroscopes. I did apply the same logic & marked only 2. But all answer keys are saying otherwise.
yeah
applied same logic
but read somewhere that apple used accelerometer in rotation stuff
so u never know
The Force,
The answer is "All three" according to this.
plmokn25688524,The Force
Regarding the accelerometer question:
1) Theoretically, A gyroscope is sufficient to cause the rotation of the screen of our phones. A gyroscope measures angular velocity.
2) But, with just a gyroscope, we cannot determine how quickly do we need to switch the screen. We also need to measure acceleration for that. To have that flawless rotation of our screen, we need both a gyro and an accelerometer.
3) Most embedded processors have both gyro+accelerometer working together, like gone are the days when we used to use gyro alone. All of our smartphones in today times, come with both gyro+accelerometer together.
So, for us to perfectly make the screen rotate on our smart phones, we need both gyro+accelerometer. So, the answer will be "All three".
Is baar upsc ne kiya kya hai............
How stupid was successful coup question.........."successful" is such a subjective word..............mainey sabsey pehle isi option ko cross kiya because of recent Sudanese "unsuccessful" coup...........chad me bhi same situation...............this is unfair...........
The Force,TomiokaGiyu
Regarding the accelerometer question:
1) Theoretically, A gyroscope is sufficient to cause the rotation of the screen of our phones. A gyroscope measures angular velocity.
2) But, with just a gyroscope, we cannot determine how quickly do we need to switch the screen. We also need to measure acceleration for that. To have that flawless rotation of our screen, we need both a gyro and an accelerometer.
3) Most embedded processors have both gyro+accelerometer working together, like gone are the days when we used to use gyro alone. All of our smartphones in today times, come with both gyro+accelerometer together.
So, for us to perfectly make the screen rotate on our smart phones, we need both gyro+accelerometer. So, the answer will be "All three".
The question is very contentious but going by logic Only, one statement is very different than the other 2 statements. To genuinely mark all 3, one would require specialized knowledge, in UPSCs terms.
The Force,Regarding the accelerometer question:
1) Theoretically, A gyroscope is sufficient to cause the rotation of the screen of our phones. A gyroscope measures angular velocity.
2) But, with just a gyroscope, we cannot determine how quickly do we need to switch the screen. We also need to measure acceleration for that. To have that flawless rotation of our screen, we need both a gyro and an accelerometer.
3) Most embedded processors have both gyro+accelerometer working together, like gone are the days when we used to use gyro alone. All of our smartphones in today times, come with both gyro+accelerometer together.
So, for us to perfectly make the screen rotate on our smart phones, we need both gyro+accelerometer. So, the answer will be "All three".
The question is very contentious but going by logic Only, one statement is very different than the other 2 statements. To genuinely mark all 3, one would require specialized knowledge, in UPSCs terms.
logic wale hi marenge sare
those who marked s/tech all true probably fared better lol
Regarding the accelerometer question:
1) Theoretically, A gyroscope is sufficient to cause the rotation of the screen of our phones. A gyroscope measures angular velocity.
2) But, with just a gyroscope, we cannot determine how quickly do we need to switch the screen. We also need to measure acceleration for that. To have that flawless rotation of our screen, we need both a gyro and an accelerometer.
3) Most embedded processors have both gyro+accelerometer working together, like gone are the days when we used to use gyro alone. All of our smartphones in today times, come with both gyro+accelerometer together.
So, for us to perfectly make the screen rotate on our smart phones, we need both gyro+accelerometer. So, the answer will be "All three".
The question is very contentious but going by logic Only, one statement is very different than the other 2 statements. To genuinely mark all 3, one would require specialized knowledge, in UPSCs terms.
logic wale hi marenge sare
those who marked s/tech all true probably fared better lol
Nah. I think UPSC has reversed the trend since 2020 when all of the above was not the correct option in science and tech application based questions. I am pretty sure for HFC, Mercury and this one, not all statements are correct.
The Force,Regarding the accelerometer question:
1) Theoretically, A gyroscope is sufficient to cause the rotation of the screen of our phones. A gyroscope measures angular velocity.
2) But, with just a gyroscope, we cannot determine how quickly do we need to switch the screen. We also need to measure acceleration for that. To have that flawless rotation of our screen, we need both a gyro and an accelerometer.
3) Most embedded processors have both gyro+accelerometer working together, like gone are the days when we used to use gyro alone. All of our smartphones in today times, come with both gyro+accelerometer together.
So, for us to perfectly make the screen rotate on our smart phones, we need both gyro+accelerometer. So, the answer will be "All three".
The question is very contentious but going by logic Only, one statement is very different than the other 2 statements. To genuinely mark all 3, one would require specialized knowledge, in UPSCs terms.
logic wale hi marenge sare
those who marked s/tech all true probably fared better lol
Nah. I think UPSC has reversed the trend since 2020 when all of the above was not the correct option in science and tech application based questions. I am pretty sure for HFC, Mercury and this one, not all statements are correct.
hope so; but then these have to be classified as extremely diff q
what do u guys says
getting 69.2 in CSAT from Insights, vision, forum(similiar Q wrong no fluctuation)
didnt mark any controversial Q which involve more than one ans
just for validation , quite anxious since last week
Mera bata do bhai.. Getting 70 from Forum and Vision and 64 from Insights.. Kya chances hain?
Write your comment…
