why not accept the money?its for a good deed from a man who went in wrong route.no one is going to copy his way of living just because pavilion is named after him.other than thinking that there is a "great person" who donated 10 lakh dollars, does public(including ourselves) enquire the background of donater and how he got the money?no ones past should dictate their future good deeds,its only the attitude which we should disagree.Any way it will be mostly public money he looted and atleast its being put to use for good deeds now
