Does anyone else felt that their interview was too factual, specially BB Vyas Board??
My 60 to 70 pc interview was factual
Although none of the facts were irrelevant but still too much fact orientation.
Board was cordial barring
1.few deliberate negative tinge
2.laughing on one of my wrong answer.
3.poker face of members
Is BB Vyas board too strict in giving marks?
Any idea?
However, most of the facts asked to me were too deep.I prepared my subjects well and thats why was able to answer most of them but still my interview felt weird and unidimensional.
2 Q from hobby 6 Q from governance
25 Q from Civil +Environment engg+Environment
No IR No Current