All India Simulator Test Series for Prelims 2022
24th May Update
PTS-2022 | All India GS Simulator | Test X | Offline Only Ranklist | ClickHere to check your score
Corrigendum PTS 2022 GS Simulator Test X | ClickHere
The simulator Test X has Cut-off Marks 106.67.
23rd May Update
All India GS Simulator-X Solution: https://go.forumias.com/r51
All India CSAT Simulator-X Solution: https://go.forumias.com/r52
All India GS Simulator-X Live Discussion: https://go.forumias.com/livegsx
16th May Update
PTS-2022 | All India GS Simulator | Test 6 | Offline Only Ranklist | ClickHere to check your score
The simulator Test 6 has Cut-off Marks 100.
11th May Update
Dear Students,
There is an update in the Corrigendum of Simulator 2022 Test 5. There is 1 more change in the answer. In Q.42 correct answer is Option b. Also, some extra explanation has been provided.Click Here to update Corrigendum
10th May Update
PTS-2022 | All India GS Simulator | Test 5 | Offline Only Ranklist | ClickHere to check your score
Corrigendum PTS 2022 GS Simulator Test 5 |ClickHere
The simulator Test 5 has
Cut-off Marks 94.
3rd May Update
PTS-2022 | All India GS Simulator | Test 4 | Offline Only Ranklist | Click Here to check your score
The simulator Test 4 has Cut-off Marks 94.
26th April Update
PTS-2022 |
All India GS Simulator | Test 3 | Offline Only Ranklist |Click
Hereto check your score
19th April Update:
PTS-2022 | All India GS Simulator | Test 2 | Offline Ranklist |Click Hereto check your score
Corrigendum GS Simulator Test-2 |Click Hereto check
If you have attempted the Test in Online Mode, you can check your detailed analytics on your portal by visitinghttps://academy.forumias.com/
10th April Update:
Towatch PTS 2022 | All India Simulator | Test - 1 | Live Discussion, please visit the below link:
9th April Update:
Students can download their hall ticket by visiting: https://hallticket.forumias.com/
If
you need further assistance please write to us atfarej@flaviant.comor call us at9311740914and9311740948.
4th April Update:
Question Paper of GS Simulator – 0:Click Here
Solution of GS Simulator – 0:Click Here
Discussion video of GS Simulator – 0:Click Here
Revised Results of GS Simulator – 0 (Offline) -Click Here
Revised Consolidated results of GS Simulator -0 (Online + Offline) -Click Here
The GS Simulator test 0 has the cut-off marks 95-97.
If you are not able to find your result in above attached documents or found discrepancies in your result please reach out to Mr. Farej at farej@flaviant.com or call at 9311740914
Dear Students,
With Prelims examination hardly 68 days away, it is very important to analyse your preparation today and make corrections for final examination on 5th June.
ForumIAS is conducting All India Free Open Test (GS Simulator 0) on 3rd April 2022. This year simulators are being conducted offline in over 20 cities. Click Here to register.
With ForumIAS Simulator 0 (All India Free Open Test), gauge your preparation, analyse mistakes, develop analytical and reasoning ability, and most importantly gauge your competition. The tests will be supplemented with a) All India Ranking, b) Solutions and c) Live discussion.
Every year since 2016, 8000 - 12000 students have appeared in GS Simulator 0.
Click here to register for Simulator 0 https://go.forumias.com/sims
To know more about ForumIAS All India Simulator Test Series Click Here
JohnDoe7,
I m getting rank 71 from 5655 students in the pdf
But getting rank of 421 out 5846 students in scorecard section. So even if that rank count for student that gave exam after the real time, still there is discrepancy in rank.
Can someone from Forum please clarify.
Thank You
Kindly wait..Revised results will be published at 2 PM
Purplesunbird,I m getting rank 71 from 5655 students in the pdf
But getting rank of 421 out 5846 students in scorecard section. So even if that rank count for student that gave exam after the real time, still there is discrepancy in rank.
Can someone from Forum please clarify.
Thank You
I have a doubt.
How come more people wrote paid simulator test 1(total5655) than free open simulator test 0 (total2759) ? Actually, Reverse should be the case: More people attempting free simulator than paid simulator. Many who have written free simulator would not have taken paid simulator.
The number of attempts/ranks for simulator 1(paid) should actually be lower than simulator 0(free). Instead it ismore than doublethe attempts for simulator 0.
I am doubting whether the mark list is genuine. I might bewrong. But I am curious to know since I am giving the tests.
Forum, Please provide rank list with full names and full roll numbers just like you did for Open simulator test. Also provide offline and consolidated rank lists just like open test.
Satya_Narayana,I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is not genuine.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is manipulated.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
.
I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is not genuine.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
I have already told all of you that Don't consider the pdf ranklist.It is happened by mistake from our side So, please visit your portal. You can see your rank, details analysis and percentile.
I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is manipulated.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
I genuinely hope that you won't be shadow banned. 🤲🏼
No this will not be the case. The concern is genuine. The said profile is not a trouble maker, or writing only to create trouble. In short , he has not created this account ONLY to create ruckus.
I am no knight. Do not call me Sir
I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is not genuine.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
I have already told all of you that Don't consider the pdf ranklist.It is happened by mistake from our side So, please visit your portal. You can see your rank, details analysis and percentile.
This should not be the case, and this is wrong.
1. Please note that the PDF result should only be for offline, given that in online mode unfair means may be used, and we see a complete bloating of marks in the online mode.The offline list may have lesser students but is more genuine.
2. Offline List must have collated score of students from State Administrative Institutes and Other Institutes which Forum Tests are being written in offline mode.
3. The rank on the portal is likely to be behind/poorer as compared to PDF ranklist as more students write test online, and they may use unfair means too.
4. There will be an offline ranklist after every test having only students who have written the test in offline mode on the date of release of the test.
5. I am aware of the issue of .00 and .33. That is not a manipulated ranklist from my knowledge. What has happened is different centers have provided the scorecard , and not realised that the decimals will make difference in cut off and score. This is merely a guess as of now, given that the common software used for OMR does by default truncate the decimals, unless you manually set it to include decimals upto two places. This is what I remember when I tried a couple of software form OMR way back in 2016. Also, we do have a number of emails where students have not been able to get their exact score.
6. We should be able to sort any discrepancy in the result today late night.
I am no knight. Do not call me Sir
I have found aSerious Discrepancy.There are high chances that the rank list of simulator 1 is not genuine.
Look at marks of the people in rank list.
In any prelims exam, There is equal probability that marks of a candidate end with ".00" or ".67" or ".33".
Incase of Simulator 0 the marks look genuine , with almost same number of people with marks ending with .00 , .67 , .33.
However in case of Simulator 1: The are severely high number of people with marks ending with ".00". While marks ending with ".67" and ".33" are very low.
Anyone cntrol + F the rank lists and search for .00 / .67 / .33 and check it for your self.
In worst case scenario I might be wrong but probability of getting 5015 vs 345, 295 is very low in fact it is impossible.
I have already told all of you that Don't consider the pdf ranklist.It is happened by mistake from our side So, please visit your portal. You can see your rank, details analysis and percentile.
This should not be the case, and this is wrong.
1. Please note that the PDF result should only be for offline, given that in online mode unfair means may be used, and we see a complete bloating of marks in the online mode.The offline list may have lesser students but is more genuine.
2. Offline List must have collated score of students from State Administrative Institutes and Other Institutes which Forum Tests are being written in offline mode.
3. The rank on the portal is likely to be behind/poorer as compared to PDF ranklist as more students write test online, and they may use unfair means too.
4. There will be an offline ranklist after every test having only students who have written the test in offline mode on the date of release of the test.
5. I am aware of the issue of .00 and .33. That is not a manipulated ranklist from my knowledge. What has happened is different centers have provided the scorecard , and not realised that the decimals will make difference in cut off and score. This is merely a guess as of now, given that the common software used for OMR does by default truncate the decimals, unless you manually set it to include decimals upto two places. This is what I remember when I tried a couple of software form OMR way back in 2016. Also, we do have a number of emails where students have not been able to get their exact score.
6. We should be able to sort any discrepancy in the result today late night.
My score card also shows a discrepency of 0.33 marks. Please take care to have offline list published without filling it up with online test takers, as it fails to give real picture. Also kindly award the 0.33 marks. Every mark matters.
#ourmarksmatter
GaneshGaitonde,
Write your comment…
